tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30026901.post4523953525528265148..comments2009-06-22T08:21:07.934-07:00Bright Lights Film Journalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07283371703328315147noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30026901.post-69051880060549506502008-11-14T06:58:00.000-08:002008-11-14T06:58:00.000-08:00Thanks, brother. I checked out your site, good points about the goddamned shaky cams and cross-cutting. I hate directors who don't trust any one scene to hold the audience's attention, so they have to cram five different set pieces together. D.W. Griffith is probably rolling over in his grave.Erich Kuerstenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02850572368098319317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30026901.post-6461464867094547552008-11-14T05:25:00.000-08:002008-11-14T05:25:00.000-08:00Terrific post and great analysis! I've excerpted this in a section of my site called "From the brains of other bloggers..." in which I grab a compelling sentence of yours and link it - more or less completely out of context - back to your post.Burbankedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14060477901077195090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30026901.post-86111352067789965872008-11-13T08:27:00.000-08:002008-11-13T08:27:00.000-08:00Dassanowsky rocks!Erich Kuerstenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02850572368098319317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30026901.post-90364844293896640032008-11-12T22:35:00.000-08:002008-11-12T22:35:00.000-08:00Robert von Dassanowsky also explores the "new" Casino Royale and the new Bond with some challenging concepts about elastic time, code names, and Craig as (wow)...."son of Bond" at: http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/08/47/james-bond.htmlJoel Greenbergnoreply@blogger.com