Reading Joseph Aisenberg's excellent piece (below) I'm compelled to offer my understanding of the great Von Sternberg's stylistic obsessiveness, especially since it's something I understand and share. (This began as a reply post, but it got sooo long). Please read Aisenberg's discussion of THE SCARLET EMPRESS below if you haven't yet, so that my discussion of obsession will have some grounding.
If you know Marlene's history you know she liked to sleep with a lot of different people, and broke the hearts of adoring males (and females) all the time when they realized they would never "own" her totally, and so if you want to keep a girl like that, you have to learn to share (which her husband well knew, as he archived all her various love letters for her), and that's where masochism and sublimation comes in. Imagine being JVS and you're basically living at Marlene's estate, painting a picture out on the lawn and here comes Gary Cooper's car and you know that you wont be sleeping with Marlene all weekend, and will just have to wait til she gets bored of Cooper, who is taller and younger than you, etc. Do you throw your canvas to the ground and have a fit? Get a gun and run around the estate like the thuggish gamekeeper in Rules of the Game? Neither one will get you anywhere but in jail or laughed at. The artist Von Sternberg on the other hand lives for that moment, converting the emotional energy via artistic sublimation, Sternberg's painting merely becomes darker and more twisted... better, in short.
For a normal person such a thing can be unbearable, but an artist that can use that energy--sublimate and harness it into art--might even find it addictive. Luis Bunuel is another of cinema's great masochists, and their link is forged by covering the same material in their last great films: The Devil is a Woman and That Obscure Object of Desire.
In each film a rich nobleman who can basically "have anything he wants" falls for a low class prostitute who proceeds to manipulate the hell out of him, taking his money and giving him blue balls in return, time and time again, for years. Marlene in DEVIL IS A WOMAN knows exactly how to keep this nobleman interested, by not just holding out sex from him but also flaunting her trysts with other men. Nothing engulfs a man in the hell of jealousy like watching a beautiful woman reject you in favor of someone far beneath your standing, though perhaps taller and more virile (though its better if they're toothless old wretches, for full knife-twisting agony).
From a psycho-analytic standpoint it's the controlling superego, which has been driving you mad with its unyielding imperatives, finally finding its nadir and so letting you alone for awhile. The superego relaxes because it simply cannot top the disgrace you are currently feeling. The needle's hit the top on the "less than" Geiger counter and so, in a sense, you are free. A similar thing occurs when someone is naturally a worrier, all the time fearing some accident or attack, and then BAM! their house is on fire or they get in a huge collision and suddenly they're calm, they're in the zone, their worries have vanished because they've found a home.
It is in this sense especially that people with enormous power and responsibility, such as film directors, find themselves drawn to the freedom of submitting to masochistic domination (the most regular clients at bondage dungeons tend to be high level executives, according to my shady sources). When it boils right down to it, nothing calms the agitated mind more than watching its worst fears finally come true, over and over again, from the safety and comfort of a velvet cage, which recalls the sickly thrill of awaiting a childhood spanking.
Back in the sexually uninhibited days of Weimar-era era Berlin these things were all the rage, and Sternberg and Dietrich participated. This kind of kinky stuff had to be doubly sublimated to get into Hollywood movies, but its concepts fit in perfectly with the "submission" to the code and the way such an iron rule opened the door for passive-aggressive attacks on its dreary morality. Nothing makes vice sweeter than its prohibition! Add this to the very nature of cinema viewing (voyeurism) itself, and viola! Art.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Josef Von Sternberg's Super-Masochist Sublimation Power!
Posted by
Erich Kuersten
at
9:29 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
E., this was an interesting take. I actually don't know much about either Sternberg or Dietrich other than movies. I had no idea they had been married, or lovers or whatever. Telling it the way you do, it reminds me of the stuff I read about the ways in which Godard would use and punish Anna Karina for the philandering he pretty much pushed her into. I can't wait to see the last two Dietrich/Sternberg collaborations I haven't gotten around to.
P.S. I took your advice and watched the 1932 Fredric March version of Dr. Jeykll and Mr. Hyde and loved it. It's quite stylish. The film is entirely and fascinatingly split at every level, thematically, dramatically and cinematically. I loved the wonderful use of the windshield style wipe transitions that would stop mid-wipe for a few moments so that the Victorian world and the low class one would hover on the screen simultaneously. March was absolutely terrific (as Jeykll, he seemed so bland you just had no idea what witty explosive disturbing gusto he would display as Hyde), you could just about taste the hideous sexual glee he experienced in sadistically terrorizing poor Miriam Hopkins--it was surprisingly effective, because it managed to be awful, cruelly pleasurable and funny at the same time; yet you really did feel for the Hopkins character, who simply had nowhere to turn as social trash. The movie really took what only just hovered behind the Stevenson story and made it rather shockingly explicit. In fact I can't think of another version I've seen that focuses so specifically on the sexual vice side of the story.
Also I have got, but not yet watched Mandingo. More later.
Joseph, I am glad you liked HYDE, which still freaks me out to this day with all that lurid footage restored. Have you seen The Story of Temple Drake? Very similar though cheaper looking, but Miriam is in a similar dire strait.
I recently re-watched the 1932 Murders in the Rue Morgue, also very pre-code grisly! The DVD is amazingly vivid, directed by the great Robert Florey with an almost Sternbergian eye.
No sir, I haven't seen either of the films you mentioned but I shall indeed.
By the way, watched Mandingo and while I thought Mason and Susan George were ickily terrific; Perry King was quite good as well--I thought the film was rather on the obvious side. You knew from the begining that King's niceness would be shown to be almost worse than the non-stop sadisticness of the other whites (isn't that, annoyingly, what's up with his gimp leg? I.E. he's a passive and wilting coward with man issues). Funnily the movie still seemed to be pretty much the white side of the story as well, only using the black characters to score points off the slave masters. This effect was enhanced by the fact that, strangely, all but a couple of the African American actors in the smallest parts weren't very good; the buff actor playing the special breed of slave was particularly wooden in my opinion. I found all the ghastly details queerly unaffecting, except for the terrific scene where George beats her slave rival for King's affections with a whip causing her to miscarry. That George sure was a game girl, wasn't she? She just was willing to bring all kinds of strange, scabrous sexual currents to the surface that would have seemed like creepy sexism if she weren't so talented. Anyway, this film was so clear and relentless in its intent that it just didn't churn me up the way that a much more ambivalent and unbalanced film like Straw Dogs did. I'll make another exception though. Despite the fact I knew Perry King's niceness was just a trap being set on the audience he nearly, fleetingly, did make me identify with him, which was interestingly uncomfortable. Had it toyed more with this, I think the film might have really offended me and gotten under my skin. But all that mirroring incest and rape and those sadistic beatings, and the slave fights, which in my opinion were not the best way to make use of very very expensive merchandise, was like something out of a Pam Grier movie, but not as sassy. Though it was well filmed. Something about its atmosphere sort of reminded me of the wonderful Clint Eastwood film where he's trapped in that girl's school during the Civil War and has his leg amputated out of jealousy.
Post a Comment