Thursday, December 18, 2008

A Muppet Christmas: Letters from Another Era

The by now hideously distended Muppet franchise received another subpar entry on network television last night in the form of "A Muppet Christmas: Letters to Santa". Is anyone else willing to admit that they actually sat through this thing in its entirety? Furthermore, did anyone else actually like it for the most part, taking it for what it was? Both Nathan Lane and Uma Thurman turned in decent if half-assed cameos -- the holiday season's tv candy.

I'm of the mind that any Muppet special is worth sitting through at least once (provided that it contains real Muppets and not animated ones, ie "Muppet Babies," etc). The "Letters to Santa" special also marked the first time Jim Henson's lovely creations were filmed and then subsequently broadcast in High Definition -- a curious landmark for a gaggle of scrappy creatures built from discarded felt and halved ping-pong balls. I was raised on a steady diet of "Emmet Otter" and "Fraggle Rock" VHS tapes and always wondered how such artifacts would survive the leap to digital. The added depth and definition offered by DVDs, for example, is not particularly kind to "Emmet Otter's Jug Band Christmas," which is constantly transitioning between miniature marionette sets and half-scale puppet ones.

Still, there's an intimacy to puppetry -- or even muppetry -- that digital animation, or animation of any kind, can't precisely duplicate (though its goals are, granted, quite disparate). The fact that there's a human hand occupying the tiny heads of Kermit, Fozzie, Gonzo, et al makes all the difference, particularly when that hand pulls off a moment of jerry-rigged emotional authenticity (Muppet faces -- eyes and eyebrows -- are not all that expressive, and Kermit, for example, must crinkle his lips to express confusion or disgust, a behavior that Henson himself was the undisputed master of).

I was rather saddened to learn, via the end credits of "Letters to Santa," that the voices of the Muppets were not also their physical manipulators. Aside from a few exceptions (ie Mama Otter), Henson continually insisted that this be the case, and much Muppet dialog was recorded while the puppeteering was taking place in the early days. There is plenty of Muppet magic missing from "Letters to Santa": Jerry Nelson* and Jim himself have gone on to that great Muppet Workshop in the sky, along with writer Jerry Juhl (no one could write a lame joke like Jerry Juhl), Frank Oz is directing comedies we need not speak of and Paul Williams looks half-dead, also contributing a smattering of phoned-in compositions. But people die; careers crumble; artists age. Traditions, on the other hand, in some respects should not. If there's any confusion regarding who's to blame for most of this, it's easily cleared up by the Disney logo that tags the special. I am not particularly looking forward to the upcoming Muppet movie, but it all poses a rather complex existential koan: Are these Muppets better than no Muppets at all?

Watch the special on HULU and simply close your eyes during the commercial breaks.

*Correction: Jerry Nelson is still alive and kicking, just retired from the Muppets (thanks to "Seeing I" for the correction). According to Wikipedia, which I hesitate to reference, he may reprise his role as Gobo for an upcoming Fraggle movie -- indeed, the film would truly suffer without his natural innocence. Robin the Frog in "Letters from Santa" was, simply, not Robin due to Nelson's absence.

11 comments:

Erik H said...

the muppets used to be shaggy revolutionaries. There's a great "screen test" on the muppet movie DVD where it's just kermit and fozzie sitting on a tree branch in a field somewhere, talking like a couple of witty, shaggy 70's era hippie guys. That few minutes blows away anything the muppets have done in the last 25 years (at least)

Anonymous said...

My daughter is two years old and she liked it a lot. She laughed and pointed at the screen and clapped. When it was over she got upset. I would think that 40 year old hipsters are not the target audience for this kind of programming. But I could be wrong.

Joseph "Jon" Lanthier said...

Erik H: You are spot-on, and if you've ever seen Henson early work -- especially the Oscar-nominated short "Timepieces," you can see just how much he loved Beat and Hippie counter-culture. Although Henson was raised as a Christian Scientist, the Muppets were definitely the product of their era. Also of note: the Special Edition of "Emmet Otter" features copious outtakes where Frank Oz lets loose a string of off-color remarks in character as Mama Otter (her voice was later dubbed by a different actress).

Anonymous: true enough, and if I had kids I might have enjoyed the special more. That having been said, I am neither 40 years old nor a hipster. I'm a crotchety 20-something who abhors everything about contemporary culture and demands the Muppets of old, dammit! :)

Seeing_I said...

Erik H - you're totally right, Fozzie's existential crisis is priceless. It's a real shame that they removed it from the Muppet Movie DVD - probably because they realized that Jim and Frank are totally stoned, at least in the later sequence in the car.

I watched some of last night's special and was pretty disappointed. Jerry Nelson isn't dead, though, thank goodness.

The Muppets are great nostalgia items for me, and it's lovely to see them turn up in cameos, but with Jim and Jerry Juhl dead and Frank Oz in Hollywood, the magic just isn't there. However, I am intrigued to see the Jason Segal movie planned for next year.

Joseph "Jon" Lanthier said...

Thanks, Seeing I, for the correction about Nelson. The entry has been amended. He was always one of my favorites -- far less cynical in many respects than Oz, or even Henson (not that there's anything wrong with cynicism, Muppet Style).

Erik H said...

I may be 40 but I object to "hipster" as a perjorative substitute for "poseur". Damn it, without the hippies, the hipsters, and all the other cool cats, we'd all be reminiscing about the Perry Como TV special.

Anonymous said...

Smart people talking about dumb things. If all of the over-educated 20,30 and 40 somethings decided to use their intellect for something other than parsing the meaning of junk culture this country would be much better off. Just because you discuss pop culture with ironic detachment doesn't mean you're exempt from being tagged a waste.

MovieMan0283 said...
This post has been removed by the author.
MovieMan0283 said...

Anonymous #1,

Whatever we think of 40-year-old hipsters, if "it made my 2-year-old point at the screen" is the criteria by which we're judging entertainment (kids' or otherwise) than we're all in trouble.

Erik H,

It's too late. "Hipster" no longer means Miles Davis, Lenny Bruce, or Bob Dylan. It now refers exclusively to snarky, smug wastrels - and is usually lobbed by (surprise, surprise) self-loathing, in-denial hipsters (see a recent issue of Adbusters for a prime example). Perhaps someday it can be revitalized, but by then you will probably be 60 instead of 40.

Anonymous #2,

I missed the "ironic detachment" - humor, sure, but basically all I saw was somebody who retained some fondness for the Muppets and regretted their decline. In other words, regretting the fact that they had become "junk culture" as you describe it - for they were not always so.

Jon,

Perhaps, in light of your criticisms of Oz's cinematic output, the puppeteer has taken it on himself to attack your entry in character as Oscar the Grouch.

Joseph "Jon" Lanthier said...

LOL, thanks for coming to my rescue, Movieman! I had written a highly insightful retort to all these anonymous folks but you covered most of it, so...

One point, however, is that I don't necessarily disagree with everything that's being said. I'm getting sick of folks like Chuck Klosterman erecting careers off of "low culture manifestos". I'd much rather read a good, literate essay about Ornette Coleman than another existential paean to Billy Joel. But both pieces of writing have a right to exist, and be appreciated -- all the rest is just personal taste.

Oh, and if these are indeed from Mr. Frank Oz (or maybe Jerry Nelson, as punishment for my prematurely declaring him deceased?) I mourn the loss of his sense of humor. Then again, that was evident from "Death at a Funeral". Zing!

MovieMan0283 said...

Jon, I don't disagree either - which is why I though the anon.'s vitriol was misdirected.

Also, I see that Oz did not voice Oscar - it was Carol Spinney (should have realized by the voice). Wonder what he's up to these days...?