Friday, September 26, 2008

Thoughts on a Frame - I Found Stella Parish (Mervyn LeRoy 1935)

The "return of the repressed" may be a defining motif of the horror film, but it can pop up in any genre - including the woman's film.

I Found Stella Parish is a 1930s woman's film, directed by Mervyn LeRoy. It stars Kay Francis as an actress who, after achieving the pinnacle of success on the London stage, drops out of a sight in order to avoid a dark secret from her past. The frame above perfectly illustrates the theme of the film in a single powerful image.

Stella (Francis) has just departed the stage (the public world) and the enthusiastic acclaim of her audience. As she is about to enter her dressing room, someone hands her a bunch of flowers, the visual embodiment of that acclaim. She opens the door, and a direct cut to the frame above places us with Stella inside her dressing room (Stella's private world) visually and spatially dominated by the dark figure in the foreground. Note - the shadowy male foreground figure and what it represents (Stella's repressed past) doesn't enter Stella's private world - it has been there all along. The dressing room is all white - as is Stella in her white dress and white wig, carrying her white flowers - all the better to provide a startling contrast to the darkness of the foreground shape. Whiteness here equals innocence and purity, Stella's public face. The darkness of the foreground figure represents purity's opposite - filth and corruption. (No one has to explain this to the film viewer. We have already been conditioned to understand these codes.)

This is the only time in the entire movie that we actually see or hear this figure from Stella's past. And we never see his face. Thus, we never know him as more than a vaguely defined form (intentionally shot in softer focus than the rest of the frame) and a quasi-disembodied voice - which makes him all the more threatening. Moreover, he does not move. This translates into his being something eternal, a phantom that, though no longer visible, will continue to haunt Stella throughout the remainder of the film.

At the back of the frame are two portals. The door, frame right, is a portal from Stella's dressing room, her private experience of herself - i.e., her ego - to the public world. The mirror, frame left, visually linked to the shadow directly in front of it, seems like a portal from Stella's dressing room/ego to her unconscious - from which such shadows and other monsters may emerge.

3 comments:

Steve Johnson said...

A nice breakdown, Jerry. To which I might add: the figure is foregrounded in the position of the film viewer, suggesting a social layer to the commentary. As Francis's character is a public figure, this magnifies the shadow's stature as a phantom out of the communal psyche. I've never seen the film so I have no idea just what this might be. Perhaps someone else has a guess?

Erich Kuersten said...

Have you seen the film, Jerry? Is it any good? I been hearing less than stellar things.

C. Jerry Kutner said...

Interesting idea, Steve. The public, of course, adores Stella, but could this shadow figure also reflect in some way the public's unconscious, a secret wish to tear down what it adores?

Erich - STELLA PARISH is neither a very good film nor a bad one. The most interesting aspect for me was the blackmailer out of Stella's past. In a more conventional film he would be played by someone like Dan Duryea and would be a recurring character throughout instead of the abstract phantom we see only once. This is the Kay Francis IMITATION OF LIFE, the story of a diva actress's professional success contrasted with the dysfunction of her personal life. Compared to the other Kay Francis films TCM has been showing lately, it benefits from the casting of Ian Hunter as the male lead - so much better than the flat and annoying George Brent. Hunter plays a newspaper reporter, the man who exposes the incognito Stella while pretending to romance her. This relates STELLA to another LeRoy film, FIVE STAR FINAL (1931), which also looked at the unscrupulousness of the press.